One of the deepest and present discussions is the formation of an informal city as a market and how programs to improve neighborhoods aim to this target. Is it possible to speak of informal-origin housing as merchandise, as part of different markets and submarkets despite its high production costs, or as speeder for other markets of good and services related to construction? And, in front of an informal city located in central areas, there is a question on weather the construction values worth more that the urbanized soil or the nets for equipment and furnishing? And, in this case, what can constitute merchandise? And in this sense, should programs to develop neighborhoods be considered, coming either from local administrations or state ones and the profusion of programs to generate and support small and medium enterprises as state concern to improve the living conditions of the population or as a way to adapt to production (from soil or through maquilas) to the conditions imposed by big economic powers (real state or any other kind)?
Furthermore, the growth of the city implies urbanizing of more terrains, densification and re-urbanizing of many of its sectors. In this dynamic, interest and real state business move daily. Without considering if origin of settlements is formal or informal, transactions for sell, rent and other are present through supply and demand of intra-city migrants as well as displaced. From the rent of a room to the rent of high category offices both are promoted by entrepreneurs of the real state business up to the renamed brokers or real state indorsed by big real state and construction enterprises. In the middle of all this market, lines of formality cross those of informality. When legality is joint, in other words, formality, real state markets of transactions go to the hands of real state agencies meeting with all requirements of law. Handling of commissions for a transaction or administration begins in those neighborhoods where there was barely a simple poster saying «for sale». While renewed forces of the construction and legality join to the precarious informal zones, where socioeconomic stratus unite in heterogeneous panorama, the verbal mechanisms of sale and rent become as part of new invasions or new illegal neighborhoods.
Furthermore, the growth of the city implies urbanizing of more terrains, densification and re-urbanizing of many of its sectors. In this dynamic, interest and real state business move daily. Without considering if origin of settlements is formal or informal, transactions for sell, rent and other are present through supply and demand of intra-city migrants as well as displaced. From the rent of a room to the rent of high category offices both are promoted by entrepreneurs of the real state business up to the renamed brokers or real state indorsed by big real state and construction enterprises. In the middle of all this market, lines of formality cross those of informality. When legality is joint, in other words, formality, real state markets of transactions go to the hands of real state agencies meeting with all requirements of law. Handling of commissions for a transaction or administration begins in those neighborhoods where there was barely a simple poster saying «for sale». While renewed forces of the construction and legality join to the precarious informal zones, where socioeconomic stratus unite in heterogeneous panorama, the verbal mechanisms of sale and rent become as part of new invasions or new illegal neighborhoods.
No comments:
Post a Comment